Supporting methodology
DDRP
Purpose
Inputs
Outputs
Dependencies
Governance Controls
Interactive reference architecture
JusticeTree Architecture Center v1.
Explore the relationships between JusticeTree doctrine, public resources, community pathways, and development-stage systems in under five minutes.
Live public resourcePublished frameworkDevelopment-stageSupporting methodology
This map describes published concepts, current public resources, and intended future relationships. It does not represent a fully integrated or operational software platform. Supporting tools do not replace the JusticeTree governing framework.
01 — Ecosystem overview
Select any node
One ecosystem with clear ownership and status.
02 — JT-L0 through JT-L6
Expandable architecture cards
Follow reality from source to traceable outcome.
JT-L0Source RealityPolicies, facts, records, proposed actions
Establishes the source materials and real-world conditions that exist before interpretation or validation.
Primary question: What is the actual source reality?JT-L1Evidence CollectionStructured intake and source preparation
Organizes relevant records, citations, dates, actors, obligations, and evidence requirements without assigning a JusticeTree decision.
Supporting methods may include DDRP and CAP.JT-L2ValidationAuthority, Evidence, Timing, Execution
Applies the Four Validation Volumes and resolves each volume as Pass, Fail, Indeterminate, or Escalated.
JusticeTree-owned governing layer.JT-L3Authority VerificationRuntime scope and actor review
Checks whether the actor, source, jurisdiction, delegation, and proposed action remain authorized at runtime.
JusticeTree control: Runtime Authority Validation™.JT-L4Execution ReviewPathway and release integrity
Tests the intended actor, channel, timing window, scope, and downstream execution path before release.
JusticeTree control: Execution Integrity Window™.JT-L5Governance OversightHold, route, review, release
Determines whether the action may be released, withheld, escalated, or routed to a human-controlled safe state.
JusticeTree controls: Safe-State Routing™ and Proof of Inaction™.JT-L6Audit and TraceabilitySource-to-outcome record
Preserves the validation basis, decision events, attribution, provenance, and resulting action or inaction record.
Supporting traceability may include TraceStack™ under JusticeTree AI’s non-commercial reference license from Quantum Inquiry.03 — Validation pipeline
Proposed action pathway
No decision state without resolved validation.
01Intake
↓02Evidence
↓03Authority
↓04Timing
↓05Execution
↓06Decision State
↓07Action Released or Action WithheldProof of Inaction™ may document non-release
04 — Component explorer
Development and supporting components
Understand what each component may and may not do.
05 — Governance map
JusticeTree-owned language
Principles that change system behavior.
The governing doctrine requiring validation before consequential action.
Rechecks authority at the time and scope of the proposed action.
The timing mechanism requiring validated conditions to remain current through the release boundary.
The enforcement mechanism defining the record that an unauthorized or unresolved action was not released.
The routing mechanism for moving failed, indeterminate, or escalated actions away from execution and toward human review.
06 — Pilot pathway
Human-centered engagement
From public curiosity to controlled learning.
01Visitor
→02Qualification
→03Briefing
→04Human Review
→05Controlled Pilot
→06Results
Qualification does not approve a pilot. Briefing, review, scope, governance, and explicit institutional agreement remain required.
07 — Future modules
Registry placeholders
Named concepts with no implied operational status.
Explore a future pilot
Move from architecture to a human briefing.
Use the Qualification Center to structure a potential workflow, then request a briefing for institutional review.